Student Comments

The ViewFinder Center

OUR NEW ADDRESS

Zürcherstrasse 77
CH-8406 Winterthur
Switzerland

email: info@viewfindercenter.com
Click Here to Email Us

« Simple Outdoor Lighting Tips | Main | ViewFinder Meetup yields Photo Tips to try while you wait for Spring »
Wednesday
Apr082009

Understanding the Inverse Square Law in Photography.

Don’t let the title of this post scare you away! The inverse square law is actually quite simple and understanding it is one of the keys to understanding photographic lighting. Simply put, if you double the distance between a subject and a light source, then the illumination on the subject will be decreased by 4 times. Inversely, if you halve the distance between a subject and a light source, the illumination will be increased by 4 times.

The thing to realize here is that the relationship between distance and illumination is exponential. Illumination fades away very quickly as you move a light away from a subject.

Let’s see this in images. In each shot the camera is set to f8 at 1/500 and iso 100.

1. 70cm, f16                 2. 140cm, f8                   3. 280cm, f4                 4. 560cm, f2

In the first image the light source is 70cm away from Darth Maul and the light meter reading is f16. In each photograph, the distance between the light and Maul is doubled. So you see that when the light on Darth Maul is moved from 70cm away to 140cm away, the light meter reading changes by two f stops (16 down to 8). So even though we doubled the distance, the amount of light is reduced by 4 times (-1 stop is half the light, -2 stops is 1/4). This is where the “square” part of the law comes into play. The second photo is 2 times further away than the first. 22= 4. The inverse of 4 means that there is 1/4th of the light than in the original. The 3rd photo is 4x further away 42= 16, so 1/16th the amount of light. The lighting in the last photo is 64x darker than the first.

It is useful to understand the inverse square law, because it is one of the easiest ways to control the amount of light you use. If you find yourself in a situation where your light source is to dim, simply move the light or the subject half the distance closer. This will give you 4 times the amount of light (or two more f-stops) to work with.

One more noteworthy point about this law is that you can’t apply it to the sun. Anywhere on earth is relatively the same distance away from the sun, meaning you can’t get closer or further away to the sun to change the amount of light in your photograph. A workaround for this problem is to use a reflector. When you use a reflector, you are using the sun to create a new light source that is closer to the subject.

Now, go outside and use the Inverse Square Law!!!

Viewfinder Center for Photography is offering a class on Natural & Available Lighting on April 18, 2009 which covers this topic in depth as well as much more to help you understand and use lighting to create better photos.

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Great post and information so for about to the Inverse Square Law We can define this terms in this way, that In physics, an inverse-square law is any physical law stating that some physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity.Anwalt

July 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAnwalt

It is useful to information about the inverse square law. In this we saw the example of the light distance when it change and all the three photos shows different result. Keep sharing more about this.anwalt

July 8, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterneil

Light is such a wonderful amd mysterious enitty it moves at its own constant speed never wavering or adusting that speed for anyone or anything in a way photographers are its slave but what a wonderful challenge it is trying to figure out ways to outsmart it.You posted some very useful and practical information we all need to be reminded how important the inverse square law is.

February 12, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMike

Hi Byron, I was looking for a straightforward explanation of the Inverse Square Law.... and was pleasantly surprised to discover it was written by someone I know! Catch you next time I'm in Europe I hope.... great post and blog.

October 13, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJames Madelin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>